The average base salary for a chief executive officer jumped almost 10 per cent to $367,000 this year from 2016, while chief investment officers got an increase of 8 per cent to $314,000. By Simone Foxman
As the number of ultra-high-net worth people swells, so too does the pay for those who oversee their assets.
C-suite pay at family offices, firms that manage the wealth of the very rich, is surging, according to a report by UBS Group AG and researcher Campden Wealth. The average base salary for a chief executive officer jumped almost 10 per cent to $367,000 this year from 2016, while chief investment officers got an increase of 8 per cent to $314,000.
It looks like they’re earning their keep as family office investment returns rebounded last year. Returns averaged 7 per cent in 2016, compared with 0.3 per cent the year before, according to the report, issued Tuesday. The gains were strongest among North American firms, which had less money invested in real-estate than their international counterparts.
“The rebound can largely be attributed to two factors, better performance in equity markets and improved returns due to allocation shifts,” Stewart Kesmodel, head of global family office for the Americas at UBS, said by email. With investors moving out of fixed income and hedge funds, “those dollars have flowed into private equity, operating companies and cash flow producing assets such real estate,” he said.
With bonuses, which can account for half of total pay, the average pay for a North American family office CEO totaled $631,000, the highest among geographic regions. European family office CEOs made $497,000.
As with much of the investment world, the best-paid executives are predominately male. Women accounted for only 7.7 per cent of family office CEOs and 13.2 per cent of CIOs. Women appeared more frequently as chief operations officers and chief financial officers.
Traditionally set up to manage the accounting and tax planning affairs of a wealthy clan, family offices are growing in size and complexity, in some cases even beginning to resemble small hedge funds or investment banks. They’ve been poaching talent from Wall Street, taking advantage of challenges elsewhere in the investment management world to build in-house staff.
“Those family offices which are looking beyond preservation of capital have become more aggressive in their thesis, as well as, the talent they hire for execution,” Kesmodel said.
Returns have risen as families embraced risk by pushing cash toward public and private equity investments. Public stock investments comprise 27.1 per cent of families’ allocations this year, while private equity investments are 20.3 per cent of portfolios, the report said.
Family offices also continued their steady march away from hedge funds, echoing other institutional investors’ concerns about high fees and poor performance. Hedge fund allocations have declined to an average of 7.1 per cent in 2017 from 8 per cent in 2016, despite improved performance.
Equities will remain a strong component of portfolios, according to the report, as most family offices plan to maintain their allocations. Family offices are looking to emerging markets for opportunities: 44 per cent of those surveyed said they plan to allocate more money to developing market stocks while just 21 per cent said they intended to boost developed market stock exposure.
UBS, the world’s largest wealth manager, is competing with banks including cross-town rival Credit Suisse Group AG to lure the very wealthy to manage part of their riches. In the first half of 2017, UBS managed 831 billion francs ($870 billion) of ultra-high-net worth money, an increase of 12 per cent. However, private banks remain under relentless pressure as negative or low interest rates, the reluctance of wealthy clients to put their cash to work and competition from lower-fee passive strategies weigh on margins.
The UBS/Campden report is based on a survey of 262 families between February and May with an average wealth of $921 million. Sixty-eight per cent of respondents manage money for a single family. Year-over-year data draw on responses from more than 100 family offices that completed the survey in 2016 and 2017.